The Kroc Institute sponsored a panel discussion Monday on the recent nuclear deal with Iran at the Hesburgh Institute for International Studies. The event, titled “The Iran Nuclear Agreement: Is it a Good Deal?” featured political science professor Michael Desch, law school professor Mary Ellen O’Connell and adjunct professor Major General Robert Latiff. Moderator David Cortright, director of policy studies at the Kroc Institute, began by defining the objective of the talk, which was to evaluate the effectiveness of the recent agreement negotiated between the Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States and several other countries in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The first panelist, Desch, outlined the military and political situation before the negotiations began and described the most important terms of the agreement.Desch said prior to the nuclear talks, the United States possessed 7,100 warheads, while Israel had somewhere between 80 and 200, and Iran controlled none. Additionally, he said that there was a wide discrepancy between the nuclear capable delivery systems, which include intercontinental ballistic missiles as well as naval and air resources, of the three countries: The United States has 886, Israel has 300, and Iran between 100 and 300.“If you want a nuclear weapon, there are two ways to get it, actually three ways to get — you can buy one from somebody, but I don’t believe that’s ever happened in the history of the nuclear era,” Desch said.These two methods, according to Desch, are either enrichment of uranium through centrifuges or plutonium production from a heavy water reactor.Desch said the deal seems to have achieved the objectives desired by President Obama and his administration and advances United States national security interests.“It’s not perfect, but on the other hand, it’s as good as it gets,” Desch said. O’Connell spoke next, examining the deal in the context of international law and the possible alternative options at the United States’ disposal. “We’ve heard about two options that are allegedly available as alternatives to this very complex agreement, and one option is [to] continue with the sanctions, and the other option is [to] attack and eliminate Iran’s nuclear program with military force,” O’Connell said.The sanctions route is infeasible, O’Connell said, because the United Nations has already lifted the most effective ones, and any new unilateral sanctions the United States imposes in the future will be extremely weak in comparison. The agreement contains provisions for sanctions that will immediately snap back into place if Iran violated certain terms and requirements. The use of force to destroy the Iranian nuclear program is both morally questionable and practically very unlikely to succeed, O’Connell said.It is a violation of international law to use military force, except in cases of self-defense, she said, and any military action in self-defense must follow the principles of necessity, meaning every other option has been exhausted, and proportionality, meaning the act of self-defense does not inflict significantly greater harm than the original offense. According to O’Connell, the number of nuclear sites and their high levels of protection mean actions like bombing raids will prove ineffective and could produce civilian casualties in the millions.O’Connell said if the U.S. breaks the nuclear agreement through either unilateral sanctions or military force, Iran can easily stop following the terms of the deal.“Every obligation Iran has respecting nuclear weapons is derived from the binding nature of international law, so to treat these rules as not binding in a case which the U.S. believes is exceptional or outside the rules, makes a nonsense out of the very obligations that we are holding Iran to,” O’Connell said.Latiff spoke last, discussing myths surrounding the deal and counterarguments to refute them. According to Latiff, inflammatory rhetoric and ignorance about the actual details of the agreement has overshadowed much of the public discussion on the deal.Some of the opponents of the deal have valid claims that Iran does sponsor terrorism and is an outspoken enemy of the United States, he said, but the U.S. must still negotiate with countries it finds contemptible or even evil if it wants to achieve anything peacefully.“Some of the money may be used to fund terror, but this is no reason to go war,” Latiff said.Latiff said a major misconception surrounding the agreement is that it limits the United States’ ability to attack Iran. “This deal gives us a better opportunity and more information should we decide to go to war, which I hope we don’t,” Latiff said.Another criticism of the agreement, Latiff said, holds the fact that International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors must request inspections in advance before they examine nuclear sites allows Iran to cheat on its obligations. However, Latiff said this was a necessary concession.“Would we allow foreign inspectors unfettered access to our nuclear facilities? No,” Latiff said.Tags: Iran, Kroc Institute, nuclear agreement
NORTHEAST HARBOR — The 39th annual Northeast Harbor Ambulance Service 5-mile Road Race and Family Fun Walk are slated for Saturday, Aug. 20.All proceeds will benefit the Northeast Harbor Ambulance Service, Inc. — a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation. The scenic race course will begin on Sargeant Drive. Walkers will start at 9 a.m., and runners will take off at 9:30.Participants should park in downtown Northeast Harbor, and they will be taken to the starting line by bus from Great Harbor Museum on Main Street.Some 200 runners competed in the race last year. The first 75 entrants will receive free T-shirts. Race day registration from 7:30 to 9 a.m. is $25, and pre-registration is $20.This is placeholder textThis is placeholder textIn addition to the races, the ambulance service also is selling raffle tickets. Prizes have been donated by local businesses and include gift certificates to Asticou Restaurant, Milk & Honey, Colonel’s and Tan Turtle; merchandise from Wini Smart Studio, Shaw Jewelry, Kimball Shop, Swallowfield, Holmes Store, McGrath’s and The Romantic Room; and a Sea Princess boat cruise.Times will be computed by Crow Athletics.Register online at www.nehambulance.org, or call 299-0207 for a registration form.
Photo: The fire ripped through this building on Sunday evening – Christine Rumleskie/Energeticcity.caThe fire that ripped through the Rosenau Transport and Unified Valve site has been deemed an accident. While the official cause has not yet been determined, Fort St. John Fire Chief Fred Burrows says the fire was not human caused. – Advertisement -[asset|aid=1759|format=mp3player|formatter=asset_bonus|title=8e6aa853d8a16b3a63427e42c2ca98c1-Burrows – cause fire 1_1_Pub.mp3] Investigators began searching the site on Tuesday afternoon, for clues as to what caused the Sunday night fire. Chief Burrows says one area in particular is of interest to the investigation. [asset|aid=1760|format=mp3player|formatter=asset_bonus|title=8e6aa853d8a16b3a63427e42c2ca98c1-Burrows- cause fire 2_1_Pub.mp3]Advertisement Evidence has been sent out to the Office of the Fire Commissioner, and now the Fire Department will have to wait for a report to determine the exact cause. This is expected to take a few weeks. Chief Burrows also says the Fire Department has obtained an extensive list of chemicals that were stored in the warehouse, which he says includes many methanol-based substances. Click here for more info on Sunday’s fire.